AI-assisted review
Automated checks. Human decisions.
Automation makes review consistent and fast at the observation stage. It does not make the certification decision. Every automated candidate finding is confirmed, reclassified or dismissed by a qualified reviewer.
- Surface
- ScriptClear platform
- Availability
- Included with certification
Automated analysis produces candidate findings only. No automated output alone changes certification status.
- Website Assessment ReportPDF
- Findings ReportPDF
- Executive Compliance ReportPDF
- Corrective Action ReportPDF
- Evidence SummaryPDF
- Built for
- Compliance operations
- Automation
- Checks, validated by reviewers
- Evidence
- Collected once, reused
- Output
- Shareable reports
Division of labor
What automation does, and does not decide.
Automation does
Scans content and documentation against published criteria and flags candidate observations with citations.
Learn moreAutomation does not
Confirm a finding, judge clinical appropriateness, or issue a certification decision.
Learn moreReviewers do
Confirm, reclassify or dismiss every candidate finding and record the reason.
Learn moreHuman in the loop
How a candidate finding becomes a recorded one.
- 1
Candidate generated
Automated analysis identifies a possible gap against a specific criterion.
- 2
Reviewer assignment
A qualified reviewer is assigned to the candidate based on subject area.
- 3
Confirmation or dismissal
The reviewer confirms the finding, adjusts its severity, or dismisses it with a documented reason.
- 4
Record
Only reviewer-confirmed findings appear in the certification record and reports.
Quality control
How consistency is checked across reviewers.
- Reviewer decisions are logged with the reasoning behind them
- A sample of confirmed and dismissed findings is checked for consistency across reviewers
- Disagreements are escalated rather than resolved unilaterally
- Reviewers do not decide appeals on findings they issued
Reviewer qualifications
Who performs the human half of the review.
Automated tooling narrows what a reviewer needs to look at. It does not lower the bar for who is qualified to make the call.
FAQ
Questions we hear often
- Can I see why a candidate finding was dismissed?
- Reviewer decisions, including dismissals, are recorded with a stated reason as part of the review record.
- Does faster automated scanning mean a faster certification decision?
- It can reduce the time spent on initial observation, but reviewer validation and any remediation still set the overall timeline.
Not sure where your organization stands? Start with a preliminary eligibility check.
Compliance should be clear, not complicated
See the standard the reviewers apply.
Read the full review methodology, then apply to have your organization assessed against it.
Know where you stand. Fix what matters. Stay ready.
See it in action
Automated observations, then human validation.
AI-assisted review surfaces preliminary observations and organizes the work — a reviewer still validates every finding.
Preliminary observations
Click an observation to see evidence and recommended next action.